Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Project Cathedral

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:00, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Project Cathedral

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet general notability guideline: could not find significant coverage in reliable sources. Unsourced, orphaned, created by a single-purpose account. GregorB (talk) 13:18, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:14, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as completely lacking independent references. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:41, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:04, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. There doesn't seem to be any coverage of the project by reliable sources. The article is promotional, and is likely an advertisement for the subject.--SGCM (talk) 03:22, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - too many peacock terms, so at the least start from scratch. Bearian (talk) 20:32, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.